Complete response letter
Metacel Pharmaceuticals, LLCOzobax (baclofen) oral solution Img/mL
NDA 208193 ·
- Company
- Metacel Pharmaceuticals, LLC
- Application
- NDA 208193
- Letter date
- FDA center
- Division of Neurology Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
- FDA file
- 208193_2019_Orig1s000OtherActionLtrs.pdf
New to these? What a complete response letter means, and what the company has to do next.
Other letters to Metacel Pharmaceuticals, LLC
The letter
As published in FDA’s complete response letter transparency release (export 2026-08-26). The text is machine-read from FDA’s PDF, so spacing and spelling errors are artifacts of that process; (b) (4) marks FDA’s own redactions.
NDA 208193 COMPLETE RESPONSE
Metacel Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Attention: Jeff Bryant, Chief Operating Officer 137 N. Broad Street, Suite E
Winder, GA 30680
Dear Mr. Bryant:
Please refer to your New Drug Application (NDA) dated January 9, 2016, received March 11, 2016, and your amendments, submitted pursuant to section 505(b)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for Ozobax (baclofen) oral solution Img/mL.
We acknowledge receipt of your amendment dated January 1, 2018, which constituted a complete response to our January 11, 2017, action letter.
We have completed our review of this application, as amended, and have determined that we cannot approve this application in its present form. We have described our reasons for this action below and, where possible, our recommendations to address these issues.
PRODUCT QUALITY
Reference ID: 4282766
NDA 208193 Page 2
It was clearly stated in the January 11, 2017, Complete Response Letter, item #7, that if the identity, assay, or related substance method has to be modified to be fully validated, drug product samples may require retesting. If there are no samples available for retesting, drug product stability studies need to be repeated, since the current data would not reliable. Therefore, you should place an additional 2 batches of the drug product on stability, according to ICH Q1A (R2), and submit sufficient long-term stability data to support the proposed shelf life.
NONCLINICAL
oO@
PRESCRIBING INFORMATION
We reserve comment on the proposed labeling until the application is otherwise adequate. We encourage you to review the labeling review resources on the PLR Requirements for Prescribing Information and Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Final Rule websites, including regulations and related guidance documents and the Selected Requirements for Prescribing Information (SRPI) — a checklist of important format items from labeling regulations and guidances.
If you revise labeling, use the SRPI checklist to ensure that the prescribing information conforms with format items in regulations and guidances. Your response must include updated content of labeling [21 CFR 314.50(1)(1)()] in structured product labeling (SPL) format as described at http://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/DataStandards/StructuredProductLabeling/default.htm
Prior to resubmitting the labeling, use the SRPI checklist to correct any formatting errors to ensure conformance with the format items in regulations and guidances. Your response must include updated content of labeling [21 CFR 314.50(1)(1)(i)] in structured product labeling (SPL) format as described at
http://www. fda.gov/ForIndustry/DataStandards/StructuredProductLabeling/default.htm.
To facilitate review of your submission, provide a highlighted or marked-up copy that shows all changes, as well as a clean Microsoft Word version. The marked-up copy should include annotations that support any proposed changes.
PROPRIETARY NAME Please refer to correspondence dated, March 30, 2018, which addresses the proposed proprietary name, Ozobax. This name was found acceptable, pending approval of the application in the
current review cycle. Please resubmit the proposed proprietary name when you respond to the application deficiencies.
Reference ID: 4282766
NDA 208193
Page 3
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
We have the following comments/recommendations that are not approvability issues:
1. Product Quality
4 s ) e Perform a risk assessment screening we
e Provide batch analysis data on the drug product, batch C0412.
e Provide reference standard source information oy
2. Container Labels
e As currently presented, the format for the expiration date is not defined. To minimize confusion and reduce the risk for deteriorated drug medication errors, identify the format you intend to use. We recommend using a format like either DDMMMYYYY (e.g., 31JAN2013), MMMYYYY (e.g., JAN2013), YYYY-MMM-DD (e.g., 2013- JAN-31), or YYYY-MM-DD (e.g., 2013-01-31).
e The current temperature statements do not contain the temperature scale designation (Le., “°C” or “°F”) after each numerical value. We are concerned that this information could be misinterpreted and may pose a risk of drug degradation. We recommend you ensure that the degree symbol and temperature scale follows each numeric value denoting temperature ranges to increase clarity. For example, revise a
©® to read
ow
e The following cautionary statement is present on the container label ow
©® which mia mislead users In response to an Information Request sent to the Sponsor on June 3, 2016, the Sponsor submitted an amendment to its NDA on June 10, 2016. ms We recommend you remove the statement from the container label.
OTHER
Within one year after the date of this letter, you are required to resubmit or take other actions available under 21 CFR 314.110. If you do not take one of these actions, we may consider your lack of response a request to withdraw the application under 21 CFR 314.65. You may also request an extension of time in which to resubmit the application.
Reference ID: 4282766
NDA 208193 Page 4
A resubmission must fully address all the deficiencies listed in this letter and should be clearly marked with "RESUBMISSION" in large font, bolded type at the beginning of the cover letter of the submission. The cover letter should clearly state that you consider this resubmission a complete response to the deficiencies outlined in this letter. A partial response to this letter will not be processed as a resubmission and will not start a new review cycle.
You may request a meeting or teleconference with us to discuss what steps you need to take before the application may be approved. If you wish to have such a meeting, submit your meeting request as described in the draft FDA Guidance for Industry, “Formal Meetings Between the FDA and Sponsors or Applicants of PDUFA Products,” December 2017 at https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM59054 1.
The drug product may not be legally marketed until you have been notified in writing that this application is approved.
If you have any questions, contact Taura Holmes, PharmD, MS, Senior Regulatory Project
Manager, at Taura.Holmes@fda.hhs.gov. Sincerely, {See appended electronic signature page} Eric Bastings, MD Deputy Director Division of Neurology Products
Office of Drug Evaluation I Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
Reference ID: 4282766
This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic signature.
ERIC P BASTINGS 06/25/2018
Reference ID: 4282766
What happens to the company after a letter like this
A complete response letter moves a timeline, a cash runway and a valuation at once. FuzeBio reads a biotech end to end on demand — the pipeline in plain English, trial design and endpoints, competitors, the cash position, and a valuation with its assumptions on the page. Moderna’s report is open in full, no account.
Open the Moderna reportA complete sample report — nothing held back, no sign-up.