All complete response letters

Complete response letter

ELC GroupLutrate® Depot (leuprolide acetate for injection), fe

NDA 205054 ·

Company
ELC Group
Application
NDA 205054
Letter date
FDA center
Office of Hematology and Oncology Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
FDA file
205054Orig1s000OtherActionLtr.pdf

The letter

As published in FDA’s complete response letter transparency release (export 2026-08-26). The text is machine-read from FDA’s PDF, so spacing and spelling errors are artifacts of that process; (b) (4) marks FDA’s own redactions.

NDA 205054 COMPLETE RESPONSE ELC Group

Attention: Julia Valentine

US Agent for GP Pharm, S.A.

1500 Market Street, 12" Floor East Tower Philadelphia, PA 19102

Dear Ms. Valentine:

Please refer to your New Drug Application (NDA) dated July 31, 2014, received July 31, 2014, submitted pursuant to section 505(b)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for Lutrate® Depot (leuprolide acetate for injection), fe 22.5 mg/vial.

We have completed our review of this application, and have determined that we cannot approve this application in its present form. We have described our reasons for this action below and, where possible, our recommendations to address these issues.

CLINICAL/STATISTICAL

1. In the approval of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists for the palliative treatment of advanced prostate cancer, testosterone levels serve as a surrogate marker of efficacy. When all available testosterone levels are used in the analysis, nn) Lutrate Depot 22.5 mg failed to achieve and maintain castrate testosterone levels in an acceptable percentage of patients.

testosterone levels between Daya! 28-168 in 83.9% of patients. Further, the results of these studies are difficult to interpret since there may have been marked variations in dose due to the extent of overfill in each Lutrate vial.

To address this deficiency, you should optimize your formulations ere el (uutate Depot 22.5 mg and conduct additional clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of your products.

PRODUCT QUALITY

2. The batch formula cannot accurately reflect drug product composition because batches were

manufactured with different amounts of excipients. Provide a batch formula that reflects the proposed composition of the drug product registration batches.

Reference ID: 3769331

NDA 205054 Page 2

4. You did not provide new information about overfill; however, you referenced Section

3.2.P.2.3.2.4 regarding the justifications provided in the original NDA. Provide justifications but NOT calculations to estimate the amount of SS

5. The chemical physical properties of the drug substance have to be generated from the actual drug substance batches produced from manufacture. Provide chemical and physical properties of the drug substance from your manufactured batches.

6. The stability of the three primary batches of drug substance and drug product is not acceptable because no stability data for the drug substance were provided in the NDA. We consider the provided drug product stability data to only be supportive since they were obtained from annual reports. In addition, these data were collected from drug product batches obtained from marketed product available in foreign countries and packaged in a different packaging configuration. Based on the above information, expiry dating for the drug substance and drug product cannot be established. Provide a stability study and related test data of the three primary batches of the drug substance and drug product.

Reference ID: 3769331

NDA 205054 Page 3

REGULATORY:

9. As stated in our PreNDA meeting minutes dated October 24, 2012, if you rely for approval on FDA’s finding of safety and/or effectiveness for one or more listed drugs, you must establish that such reliance is scientifically appropriate.

Reference ID: 3769331

NDA 205054 Page 4

PRESCRIBING INFORMATION

10. We reserve comment on the propose

labeling until the application is otherwise adequate.

We encourage you to review the labeling review resources on the PLR Requirements for Prescribing Information website including regulations and related guidance documents and the Selected Requirements for Prescribing Information (SRPI) — a checklist of 42 important format items from labeling regulations and guidances.

If you revise labeling, use the SRPI checklist to ensure that the PI conforms with format items in regulations and guidances. Your response must include updated content of labeling

[21 CFR 314.50(1)(1)(i)] in structure

product labeling (SPL) format as described at

http://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/DataStandards/StructuredProductLabeling/default.htm.

PROPRIETARY NAME

11. Please refer to correspondence dated proprietary name, Lutrate® Depot. T!

December 19, 2014, which addresses the proposed his name was found acceptable pending approval of the

application in the current review cycle. Please resubmit the proposed proprietary name when you respond to the application deficiencies.

FACILITY INSPECTIONS

12. During a recent inspection of the GP

field investigator conveyed deficienci

resolution of these deficiencies is req

SAFETY UPDATE

Pharma manufacturing facility for this application, our ies to the representative of the facility. Satisfactory uired before this application may be approved.

When you respond to the above deficiencies, include a safety update as described at 21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b). The safety update should include data from all nonclinical and clinical studies/trials of the drug under consideration regardless of indication, dosage form, or

dose level.

1. Describe in detail any significant

changes or findings in the safety profile.

2. When assembling the sections describing discontinuations due to adverse events, serious adverse events, and common adverse events, incorporate new safety data as follows:

e Present new safety data from the studies/clinical trials for the proposed indication using the same format as the original NDA submission. e Present tabulations of the new safety data combined with the original NDA data.

e Include tables that compare fr the retabulated frequencies de: e For indications other than the frequencies of adverse events

Reference ID: 3769331

‘equencies of adverse events in the original NDA with scribed in the bullet above.

proposed indication, provide separate tables for the occurring in clinical trials.

NDA 205054 Page 5

3. Present a retabulation of the reasons for premature trial discontinuation by incorporating the drop-outs from the newly completed trials. Describe any new trends or patterns identified.

4. Provide case report forms and narrative summaries for each patient who died during a clinical trial or who did not complete a trial because of an adverse event. In addition, provide narrative summaries for serious adverse events.

5. Describe any information that suggests a substantial change in the incidence of common, ut less serious, adverse events between the new data and the original NDA data.

6. Provide updated exposure information for the clinical studies/trials (e.g., number of subjects, person time).

7. Provide a summary of worldwide experience on the safety of this drug. Include an updated estimate of use for drug marketed in other countries.

8. Provide English translations of current approved foreign labeling not previously submitted.

OTHER

Within one year after the date of this letter, you are required to resubmit or take other actions available under 21 CFR 314.110. If you do not take one of these actions, we may consider your lack of response a request to withdraw the application under 21 CFR 314.65. You may also request an extension of time in which to resubmit the application. A resubmission must fully address all the deficiencies listed. A partial response to this letter will not be processed as a resubmission and will not start a new review cycle.

Under 21 CFR 314.102(d), you may request a meeting or telephone conference with us to discuss what steps you need to take before the application may be approved. If you wish to have such a meeting, submit your meeting request as described in the FDA Guidance for Industry, “Formal Meetings Between the FDA and Sponsors or Applicants,” May 2009 at http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/U CM153222.pdf.

The drug product may not be legally marketed until you have been notified in writing that this application is approved.

Reference ID: 3769331

NDA 205054 Page 6

If you have any questions, call Charlene Wheeler, Senior Regulatory Project Manager, at (301) 796-1141. Sincerely,

{See appended electronic signature page}

Geoffrey Kim, M.D.

Director

Division of Oncology Products 1

Office of Hematology and Oncology Products Center for Drug Evaluation and Research

Reference ID: 3769331

This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic signature.

GEOFFREY S KIM 05/29/2015

Reference ID: 3769331

What happens to the company after a letter like this

A complete response letter moves a timeline, a cash runway and a valuation at once. FuzeBio reads a biotech end to end on demand — the pipeline in plain English, trial design and endpoints, competitors, the cash position, and a valuation with its assumptions on the page. Moderna’s report is open in full, no account.

Open the Moderna report

A complete sample report — nothing held back, no sign-up.